During the Seattle City Council Public Safety Committee meeting on December 10, 2024, a significant discussion emerged regarding the use of blast balls by law enforcement during civil emergencies. Council members expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with this crowd control measure, particularly its lethality and the implications for public safety.

One council member highlighted the importance of establishing a clear framework for when and how blast balls can be deployed, emphasizing that such decisions should not be taken lightly. They pointed out that while law enforcement agencies advocate for using these devices as a last resort, there is a pressing need to balance the potential harm to citizens against the necessity of maintaining order during riots.

Concerns were raised about the timing of decisions related to the use of blast balls, especially if the mayor is unavailable. The council member suggested that in instances where a civil emergency is declared, it would be prudent to simultaneously authorize the use of blast balls, allowing on-the-ground officers to respond effectively to evolving situations.

The discussion also touched on the chain of command within the police department, questioning whether it is appropriate for decisions about such significant measures to rest solely with the police chief, who may also be unavailable. The council member underscored the legal and physical risks involved, referencing a past incident where the city incurred substantial financial penalties due to noncompliance with established policies.

This dialogue reflects ongoing efforts by the Seattle City Council to ensure that public safety measures are both effective and responsible, as they navigate the complexities of law enforcement practices in the community. The committee's discussions will likely influence future policies regarding crowd control and emergency response, aiming to protect both citizens and law enforcement personnel during critical situations.