State lawmakers debate digital ticketing bill amid concerns for non-tech-savvy constituents

January 15, 2025 | Industry, Business and Labor, House of Representatives, Legislative, North Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

State lawmakers debate digital ticketing bill amid concerns for non-tech-savvy constituents
The House Industry, Business and Labor II committee convened on January 15, 2025, to discuss a proposed bill concerning the issuance of digital tickets for events. The meeting highlighted various concerns from committee members regarding the implications of the bill on constituents who may lack access to technology.

The discussion began with Representative Shower expressing skepticism about the necessity of the bill, citing personal experience with constituents who struggle with digital ticketing. He acknowledged the concerns but argued that state law should not mandate solutions for these issues. Representative Koppelman suggested exploring alternatives, such as allowing individuals to pick up tickets at a will-call desk, to accommodate those without smartphones.

Vice Chair Osterley sought clarification on the proposed $40 charge for printing season tickets, questioning whether it applied per seat or for the entire season. Representative Bail confirmed that the charge would be a one-time fee for the entire season, allowing access to all games.

Representative Casper raised concerns about the potential consequences of not including provisions for those unable to obtain digital tickets. He echoed Koppelman's suggestion for reasonable accommodations, emphasizing the need for a solution that addresses the evolving nature of technology and consumer behavior. Casper also questioned whether the proposed $10 reimbursement for vendors would be sufficient in the long term, suggesting that the bill could lead to increased costs for future contracts.

The committee's discussions underscored the need for a balanced approach that considers both technological advancements and the accessibility needs of all constituents. The meeting concluded with a recognition of the importance of finding reasonable accommodations while addressing the bill's potential long-term implications. Further deliberations are expected as the committee seeks to refine the proposal.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Dakota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI