In a recent San Francisco government meeting, concerns about the future of the historic McCroskey building at 1687 Market Street took center stage. A passionate speaker, addressing the commission for what may be the last time, expressed deep apprehension over the building's impending demolition. The speaker highlighted a loophole in state legislation, specifically AB 2011, which allowed developers to bypass local historic preservation regulations if their projects were initiated before a certain date. This loophole has raised alarms among preservation advocates, as it threatens not only the McCroskey building but potentially many other historic structures across the city.
The speaker pointed out that an amendment to AB 2011, introduced by state representative Buffy Wicks, has made it easier for developers like Randall Klein to proceed with demolitions without local oversight. The urgency of the situation was palpable, as the speaker lamented the lack of resistance from the city’s planning department against what they termed "draconian state laws." The fear is that if the McCroskey building is demolished, it could set a precedent for further losses of San Francisco's architectural heritage.
In response to these concerns, city officials provided updates on other preservation efforts, including the nomination of the Ladies Relief Home at 34100 Laguna Street as a landmark, which has passed its second reading at the Board of Supervisors. This nomination represents a glimmer of hope amid the ongoing challenges faced by historic preservationists.
The meeting also touched on the broader implications of upcoming zoning changes that could affect numerous buildings in both business and residential districts. The speaker's personal connection to the issue was evident as they shared their own residence in an 1880 Edwardian building, which is also at risk of being upzoned.
As the meeting concluded, the commission members acknowledged the importance of encouraging developers to engage with the planning department early in the process to explore options for preserving historic resources. However, the tension between state mandates and local preservation efforts remains a critical issue for San Francisco, leaving many to wonder what the future holds for the city’s cherished historical landmarks.