The City of Defiance is poised to take a stand against a controversial tariff proposal from AT&T of Ohio that could shift relocation costs of utility lines onto local municipalities. During the recent council meeting, officials expressed deep concerns over the implications of this tariff, which they argue undermines municipal authority and public welfare.

City officials highlighted that private utilities' rights to occupy public rights-of-way are subordinate to the city's responsibility for public safety and welfare. They emphasized that if a public works project necessitates the relocation of utility lines—whether for road widening, emergency vehicle access, or pedestrian safety—the costs should not fall on the city or its residents.

The urgency of the situation was underscored by the fact that AT&T's tariff proposal, filed with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, could take effect within 30 days if no opposition is registered. This proposal, initially framed as a measure for beautification, contains broader language that raises alarms among municipal leaders. Over 100 municipalities, including Canton and Akron, have already voiced their opposition, and Defiance aims to join this growing list.

Council members discussed the potential for litigation if the tariff is enacted, with the Ohio Municipal League indicating it may seek financial support from its members for legal challenges. The council is considering a motion to suspend rules to formally express their opposition before the impending deadline.

As the council deliberates, the stakes are high for local governance and the financial burden on residents. The outcome of this decision could set a precedent for how utility costs are managed in Ohio, making it a critical moment for the City of Defiance and its constituents.