The Planning & Zoning Commission of Prescott convened on January 9, 2025, to discuss a proposed residential development project that has sparked considerable debate regarding its impact on workforce housing and community needs.

The meeting began with a focus on the project's potential to include workforce housing, a topic raised by a commission member who emphasized the growing demand for affordable living options over higher-priced apartments. The owner of the project, Mark Van Womer, addressed the commission, stating that the rental rates would be approximately $2 per square foot, with one-bedroom units starting around $1,500. He acknowledged the previous discussions about workforce housing but did not provide a definitive plan for incorporating it into the project.

The commission reviewed the project's site plan, noting that the number of parking spaces had only slightly increased from 146 to 153, despite an addition of 16 units. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of parking, especially considering the needs of senior residents, many of whom may own multiple vehicles. Van Womer assured the commission that the building height would not exceed 35 feet and that any mechanical systems would be contained within the units to minimize visual impact.

As discussions progressed, several commission members expressed dissatisfaction with the proposed changes, viewing them as a potential breach of public trust. One member, Jim, articulated concerns that the adjustments seemed primarily aimed at increasing profitability rather than addressing community needs. Another member, Tom Davis, echoed these sentiments, highlighting a lack of transition from lower-density developments in the area and expressing disappointment over the additional units and reduced parking.

The meeting concluded without a clear resolution on the incorporation of workforce housing, although Van Womer indicated a willingness to continue discussions with the city on the matter. The commission's deliberations underscored the ongoing tension between development interests and the community's need for affordable housing solutions, setting the stage for future conversations on how best to balance these priorities.