Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Wisconsin DNR agrees to repeal controversial firearm rule after legal challenge


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Wisconsin DNR agrees to repeal controversial firearm rule after legal challenge
The Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules convened on December 17, 2024, to discuss significant concerns regarding a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) rule that restricts firearm possession near bodies of water in Wisconsin. The meeting highlighted a legal challenge brought forth by an avid sportsman, represented by WIL, who argued that the rule violates the Second Amendment rights of citizens.

The contested rule prohibits individuals from possessing firearms on the waters, banks, or shores that may be used for fishing. Violators face a forfeiture of $200, along with court costs that can total over $500. The speaker emphasized that the rule's broad language effectively bans firearms in many outdoor areas, as nearly 15% of Wisconsin is covered by water. This regulation does not exempt law-abiding citizens with concealed carry permits, raising concerns about its fairness and enforceability.

The speaker pointed out that the DNR has acknowledged the rule's inconsistency with state law and has agreed to repeal it as soon as possible. The ongoing litigation has been paused until January 1, 2025, to allow the DNR time to act on this commitment. The speaker urged the committee to support the suspension of the rule, reinforcing the importance of upholding citizens' rights to bear arms in outdoor settings.

In conclusion, the committee's decision on this matter could have significant implications for firearm regulations in Wisconsin, particularly concerning the rights of sportsmen and outdoor enthusiasts. The DNR's willingness to repeal the rule marks a pivotal moment in addressing these legal and constitutional concerns.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting