The City of El Cajon held a council meeting on January 14, 2025, where significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed resolution that could impact the relationship between local law enforcement and the community, particularly among immigrant populations. The meeting featured multiple public speakers who expressed their apprehensions about the resolution, which aims to enhance cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

The first speaker, a long-time resident and community volunteer, emphasized the potential negative effects on community-police relations, particularly for immigrants who contribute positively to society. He urged the council to reconsider the resolution, highlighting the importance of fostering trust between law enforcement and the community.

Jose Cruz, another speaker, shared his personal experiences with police interactions in the past, expressing fears that the resolution could lead to racial profiling and harassment, particularly against individuals of Latino descent. He articulated a strong emotional response, stating that he did not want his children to grow up in an environment where they felt targeted by law enforcement.

Violet Lumberta echoed these sentiments, arguing that the resolution would further divide the community and perpetuate racial profiling. She called for the council to reconsider the implications of their actions on the Latino community, stressing the need for unity rather than division.

Pedro Rios, representing the American Foreign Service Committee, criticized the resolution as a form of fear mongering that would instill fear in immigrant populations. He pointed out that the resolution could lead to increased anxiety among residents who might feel unsafe in their own neighborhoods due to the potential for police questioning about immigration status.

Throughout the meeting, speakers consistently highlighted the potential for the resolution to create distrust between the community and law enforcement, particularly among immigrants who may already feel vulnerable. The council members were urged to reflect on the broader implications of their decision, with many residents advocating for a more inclusive approach that prioritizes community safety and trust over strict enforcement of immigration laws.

The meeting concluded with a clear call for the council to reconsider the resolution, as community members expressed their desire for a collaborative relationship with law enforcement that respects the dignity and rights of all residents. The council's next steps remain to be seen as they weigh the feedback from the community against the proposed resolution.