A recent review of a critical firefighting incident in Wichita has raised significant concerns about operational protocols and response effectiveness. During a fire at Building 300, firefighters faced a partial roof collapse while operating without a water supply, prompting a mayday call. The rapid ascent of crews indicated they were in "fast attack rescue mode," despite the fire attack mode being declared, which typically requires a Rapid Intervention Crew (RIC) as per the operations manual.

Engine 14 eventually established a tenuous water supply from an on-site hydrant, but the chosen strategies for water supply and fire attack may have delayed the rescue of a victim trapped in her apartment. Recommendations from the review suggest limiting the number and size of hand lines used from a booster tank until a reliable water supply is secured.

The review also highlighted the importance of adhering to search protocols. Firefighters are trained to prioritize life-saving efforts, regardless of dispatch instructions. Interviews revealed that crews were aware of potential life hazards on upper floors upon arrival, yet there was no indication that the effective Vent Enter Search (VES) method was employed near the fire area.

Notably, the first 911 caller, a resident in Unit 306, did not report being trapped but rather requested assistance. This distinction is crucial, as it impacts dispatch policies and response strategies. Approximately three minutes after firefighters arrived, it was reported that one person was trapped, based on information relayed by a friend of another resident.

Confusion arose as some fire companies began searching uninvolved buildings before completing the search of Building 300, leading to miscommunication about which crews were assigned to search the fire-affected area. The review underscores the need for clearer communication and adherence to established protocols to enhance the safety and effectiveness of firefighting operations in future incidents.