In a pivotal City Council meeting on January 13, 2025, Farmington Hills officials deliberated on significant developments that could reshape the community's landscape. The discussions centered around two major proposals: the approval of a new hospital sign and a planned unit development (PUD) for residential housing.

The first item on the agenda involved a motion to approve an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) submitted by Sign Works of Michigan for a new hospital sign. Council members expressed the importance of high visibility for the hospital, especially for emergency situations. The motion passed unanimously, with council members acknowledging the aesthetic and safety benefits of the new signage.

The more contentious topic arose during the public hearing for the proposed PUD located on the south side of 13 Mile Road, west of Middlebelt Road. The development, which includes two distinct housing types—Mulberry Park with 40 townhouses and the Tabernacle, an age-restricted community with 36 ranch-style units—has sparked considerable debate among residents.

Charmaine Kettler Schmalt, the Director of Planning and Community Development, presented the details of the project, emphasizing its alignment with the city’s master plan and the need for diverse housing options. The proposal aims to replace existing dilapidated structures with modern housing while preserving significant green space and adding new trees.

However, the public response was overwhelmingly critical. Residents voiced concerns about increased density, traffic congestion, and the potential loss of wildlife habitat due to the removal of over 400 trees, including landmark specimens. Many argued that the proposed density of approximately 6.3 units per acre is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods, which primarily feature larger lots.

Several residents highlighted the existing traffic challenges on 13 Mile Road, particularly at the intersection with Westgate, where turning left is already perilous. They called for traffic lights and other safety measures to mitigate the anticipated increase in congestion from the new development.

Despite the developers’ assurances of community engagement and their willingness to address concerns, many residents remained unconvinced. They argued that the project would diminish property values and alter the character of their neighborhoods, which are known for their spacious lots and natural beauty.

As the meeting progressed, council members grappled with the implications of the proposed PUD. Some expressed skepticism about whether a PUD was the appropriate tool for this development, questioning the necessity of deviating from existing zoning regulations.

The council ultimately closed the public hearing, leaving the future of the proposed development uncertain. As discussions continue, the community remains divided, with many residents advocating for a more thoughtful approach to development that prioritizes the preservation of their neighborhood's character and safety. The outcome of this meeting could set a precedent for future developments in Farmington Hills, making it a critical moment for the city and its residents.