During the York County Council meeting on January 6, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed solar manufacturing plant by Silfab in Fort Mill. Local resident Donna Forrester addressed the council for the third time, emphasizing the potential environmental and health risks associated with the plant's operations. Forrester highlighted the volatile nature of the chemicals involved, particularly silane, and questioned the safety measures in place, noting that accidents in manufacturing are not uncommon.

Forrester's comments reflect a broader community apprehension about the plant's location, suggesting that while solar energy has its benefits, the site chosen for the facility poses unacceptable risks. She criticized the council for what she perceives as a lack of responsiveness to public concerns, particularly in light of ongoing legal disputes related to the project. Forrester urged council members to reconsider their involvement with Silfab, especially in light of a recent invitation to a promotional event for the company.

The meeting also included discussions about public hearings, with council members reminding attendees of their options to speak during the designated times. Carrie Bishop, another resident, raised issues regarding the county's environmental management practices, specifically referencing a long-term maintenance program related to emissions from a local facility. Bishop's comments underscored ongoing concerns about air quality and regulatory oversight in the region.

The discussions at this meeting highlight a growing tension between community interests and economic development initiatives in York County. As the council navigates these complex issues, the implications for local health, safety, and environmental sustainability remain at the forefront of public discourse. The council's next steps will be crucial in addressing these concerns and determining the future of the proposed solar manufacturing plant.