The House Judiciary Committee of Montana convened on January 10, 2025, to discuss House Bill 121, which proposes restrictions on restroom access based on biological sex. The bill has sparked significant opposition from various community members and organizations, who argue that it discriminates against transgender and non-binary individuals.

Kristin Jordan, a resident of Missoula, expressed her strong opposition to the bill, labeling it as discriminatory and harmful. She highlighted the challenges faced by transgender individuals during their transition and emphasized the need for privacy in restrooms without infringing on the rights of others. Jordan argued that the bill assumes all transgender individuals are dangerous, which undermines the values of privacy and safety enshrined in Montana's constitution.

Pari Kemick from Billings echoed these sentiments, criticizing the bill for its potential financial burden on taxpayers and its diversion of attention from pressing issues such as housing and healthcare. Kemick pointed out that the legislation creates a false narrative of danger surrounding transgender individuals, which is not supported by data.

Erin Lambert, representing the YWCA in Billings, raised concerns about the bill's implications for domestic violence shelters, stating that it would jeopardize their ability to serve both men and women effectively. She argued that enforcing the bill would be impractical and financially unfeasible for non-profit organizations.

Elizabeth Mills Lowe also spoke against the bill, highlighting the increased risks of violence faced by transgender individuals. She noted that enforcing the bill would violate constitutional rights to privacy and could lead to further harm for an already vulnerable population.

The committee meeting underscored a growing concern among Montanans regarding the implications of HB 121, with many calling for a focus on more pressing issues affecting the state. As discussions continue, the future of the bill remains uncertain, with advocates urging lawmakers to prioritize the rights and dignity of all individuals.