The Lakeville Open Space Committee convened on January 2, 2025, to discuss the proposed Open Space Residential Development (OSRD) project and its implications for the community. The meeting followed a planning board session held on December 26, where key concerns and questions regarding the project were raised.
The developer presented plans for a residential development that includes single-family lots served by a wastewater treatment plant, while duplexes would utilize individual septic systems. Notably, the wastewater treatment facility has been relocated further from nearby residences on Margo Drive. The developer also indicated plans for 2 to 3 dog parks, although these were not detailed in the concept plan.
During the December meeting, the planning board sought input on whether to proceed with the OSRD concept, highlighting three primary questions: the viability of the OSRD approach, major concerns about the proposal, and aspects of the plan that were unfavorable. The developer expressed willingness to enter a development agreement with the town, outlining project specifics prior to the town meeting.
A significant point of discussion was the proposed Lot 1, approximately 10 acres owned by the applicant, which the developer intends to exclude from the OSRD development. The developer also mentioned a potential future rezoning of this area for commercial use, with a commitment to refrain from pursuing a 40B development if the commercial zoning fails.
The proposed development could include a maximum of 240 units, with discussions suggesting a reduction to 215 units. However, concerns were raised regarding the requirement for percolation tests for each buildable lot, which could jeopardize the proposal. The Board of Health emphasized that no septic systems should be permitted on lots smaller than 30,000 square feet due to nitrogen loading issues, which could conflict with the duplex plans.
Environmental considerations were also highlighted, with the Conservation Commission noting that the OSRD plan may have a greater environmental impact than the 40B plan, particularly concerning wetlands and certified vernal pools on the property. The commission recommended greater setbacks from wetlands and emphasized the need for continuous upland areas rather than fragmented open space.
The planning board suggested improvements to the road layout for better access and egress, particularly from County Street, and encouraged the inclusion of passive walking trails instead of playgrounds or dog parks near wetlands. Additionally, the Narragansett tribe requested a topographical overlay to identify areas of cultural significance.
In conclusion, the committee acknowledged the numerous concerns and uncertainties surrounding the OSRD proposal. No definitive decision was made regarding whether to pursue the OSRD or stick with the 40B plan, but the planning board's feedback will guide future discussions. The committee plans to evaluate what improvements could make the OSRD proposal more acceptable before moving forward.