In a recent meeting of the Evanston Preservation Commission, members expressed significant concerns regarding the incomplete draft of the zoning ordinance presented for review. The atmosphere was charged with frustration as architects and commission members highlighted the potential implications of the missing sections, particularly those related to planned developments and historic resources in downtown Evanston.

One architect voiced strong discontent, stating it was "criminal" to ask for input on a draft that lacked crucial details. The absence of comprehensive information, they argued, could drastically affect the character of neighborhoods and the appearance of buildings. This sentiment resonated throughout the meeting, with members emphasizing the need for a complete document before any meaningful feedback could be provided.

The discussion turned to the relationship between the zoning ordinance and the preservation ordinance. Members pointed out that the current draft fails to adequately reference the preservation requirements that apply to landmark properties and historic districts. This omission could lead to misunderstandings among homeowners and developers about the necessary compliance with preservation standards, which are essential for maintaining the city's historical integrity.

Concerns were also raised about the recent changes to public spaces, such as the new park on Central Street, which some felt altered the character of the area negatively. The commission members agreed that a more thorough review process was necessary, suggesting that the city should take additional time—potentially a year—to ensure all stakeholders are aligned and informed.

As the meeting progressed, the importance of clearly articulating the precedence of preservation standards over zoning regulations became a focal point. Members advocated for explicit language in the zoning code that would clarify the relationship between the two, ensuring that compliance with zoning does not equate to compliance with preservation standards.

The commission concluded with a consensus on the need for a more comprehensive approach to the zoning ordinance, emphasizing that the preservation of Evanston's historical resources must remain a priority in any future developments. As the city moves forward, the preservation commission's insights will be crucial in shaping a zoning framework that respects and enhances the community's historical character.