In a decisive ruling on December 16, 2024, Judge Stephanie Boyd sentenced Mr. Casanova to three years in prison, following a plea that acknowledged the seriousness of his past offenses. The court emphasized that probation was not suitable given Mr. Casanova's history, which played a crucial role in the judge's decision.

During the proceedings, the state had requested an eight-year sentence, but Judge Boyd found that the evidence presented did not support a violent intent from Mr. Casanova during the incident in question. The judge noted that Mr. Casanova's testimony, which indicated he was merely there to collect his mail, was credible and believable. However, she reiterated the importance of adhering to protective orders, stating that Mr. Casanova was not permitted to contact Crystal Casanova, the individual protected by the order, for the duration of his sentence.

Judge Boyd made it clear that any future contact would require a formal motion to the court, emphasizing the need for legal processes to be followed. She also instructed Mr. Casanova to change his mailing address to avoid any potential violations of the order.

As the session concluded, Judge Boyd reminded Mr. Casanova of his rights to appeal the decision, ensuring he understood the process and the availability of legal representation if needed. The courtroom atmosphere shifted as discussions turned to logistics for the jury, with lunch arrangements being made as the trial continued.