During a recent government meeting, budgetary adjustments and the future of virtual attendance at council meetings were key topics of discussion.

The meeting began with a review of budget transfers, where it was noted that salaries and wages had been adjusted to $19.3 million, with a supplemental pay line item of $10,000 introduced. Questions were raised regarding the need for additional solid waste recycling trucks, which had not been anticipated during the budget-setting process. The current vehicle acquisition strategy is reportedly in a state of uncertainty, caught between fleet enterprise contracts and leasing options.

As the meeting progressed, council members addressed the ongoing debate about virtual attendance. Council member Miss Brown expressed strong opposition to continuing Zoom meetings, arguing that public servants should be physically present to serve their constituents. She emphasized that in-person attendance is essential for accountability and public engagement, stating, \"We were elected as public servants. And we need to be in front of the public, not on a TV screen.\"

In contrast, another council member defended the virtual format, highlighting its benefits for those unable to attend in person due to various circumstances, such as illness or travel. This member argued that allowing virtual participation ensures that all constituents are represented, stating, \"If they could vote because of the ability to use Zoom, all of the people they represent would be represented in every one of our meetings.\"

The discussion underscored a divide among council members regarding the balance between traditional in-person meetings and the flexibility offered by virtual attendance, reflecting broader societal debates about remote engagement in governance. The council plans to continue evaluating these options as they prepare for the upcoming budget calendar and future meetings.