Become a Founder Member Now!

Blythewood Council Considers Controversial Remote Meeting Ordinance

August 27, 2024 | Town of Blythewood, Richland County, South Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Blythewood Council Considers Controversial Remote Meeting Ordinance
During a recent council meeting, significant discussions centered around the restoration and preservation of the historic Hoffman House and the reinstatement of remote attendance for council meetings.

Council members reviewed a proposal for interior and exterior repairs to the Hoffman House, which included the removal of 21 interior storm windows. The storm windows, originally installed as a northern solution to cold weather, have been deemed unnecessary for the local climate and are considered a moisture trap. The council confirmed that the original windows would be repaired rather than replaced, ensuring the preservation of the house's historical integrity.

The timeline for the project was also a point of discussion. Council members expressed the need for a minimum of three quotes for the roof replacement, which was initially thought to have a lifespan of ten years but was later assessed to have only five years left. The council agreed that a roof replacement would be more prudent than a soft wash, which was initially considered to clean the existing shingles.

In addition to the restoration project, the council discussed the first reading of Ordinance 2024.005, which aims to allow council members to attend meetings remotely. This ordinance seeks to reinstate a previous policy that was repealed in early 2023. The council emphasized that remote attendance should not be a means to avoid in-person participation but rather a solution for emergencies or special circumstances. Concerns were raised about the implications of allowing remote participation in executive sessions, which are intended to be private discussions among council members.

The council debated the necessity and potential consequences of the ordinance, particularly regarding quorum requirements and voting rights for remotely attending members. Some members expressed skepticism about the policy, fearing it could lead to a lack of accountability and attendance. Others suggested amendments to clarify the rules surrounding remote attendance, especially concerning executive sessions.

Ultimately, the council moved to approve the bid for the Hoffman House restoration while continuing to deliberate on the remote attendance ordinance, indicating a commitment to both preserving local history and adapting to modern governance needs.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting