In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed two-story addition to a residential property at 3411 Washington, which has sparked considerable debate among board members and staff. The applicant expressed that a setback requirement of 4 feet, 7 inches made it impractical to maintain a single-story design, leading them to pursue a two-story solution to ensure a satisfactory return on investment while preserving the home's aesthetic.

Benjamin Salado, presenting the case, provided an overview of the existing structure and the proposed changes, including detailed floor plans and elevations. The board raised concerns about the impact of the two-story addition on the neighborhood's character, emphasizing a preference for one-story designs in similar contexts. The discussion highlighted the challenges of meeting setback requirements, particularly due to the proximity of neighboring properties.

A significant point of contention arose regarding the accessory structure, which was initially approved at a larger size but had to be reduced to comply with regulations limiting it to 1,000 square feet. Board members expressed reservations about the height of the proposed accessory structure, suggesting it resembled a two-story building despite being intended for storage. A compromise was reached, with the applicant agreeing to lower the structure by one foot to address concerns while maintaining functionality.

Ultimately, the board deliberated on the best path forward, considering the historical context and the need for a design that aligns with community standards. The applicant's willingness to negotiate on the accessory structure's height indicates a collaborative approach to resolving the issues at hand. The case remains under review as the board seeks to balance the applicant's needs with the preservation of the neighborhood's character.