During a recent town meeting, residents voiced strong opinions regarding the proposed relocation of the police and public works departments, emphasizing concerns over the chosen site and the financial implications of the project.

Several community members expressed dissatisfaction with the proposed location for the new facilities, arguing that it is too far from the town center and would limit accessibility for residents. One speaker highlighted that approximately 90% of residents might never visit the new site, suggesting that it should be situated in a more visible and accessible area. The speaker also criticized the decision to build a state-funded family court building on a prime block in town, asserting that the police station should also be centrally located to enhance visibility and community engagement.

Support for the new police and public works complex was also evident, with advocates citing the current facilities as outdated and inadequate. John Peterson, a resident, emphasized the need for modern infrastructure to improve public safety and operational efficiency. He noted that the existing police headquarters is vulnerable to security threats and that the public works facility lacks essential space for operations. Peterson argued that a new complex would not only enhance emergency response times but also foster stronger community relations through accessible public spaces.

However, concerns about the financial burden of the project were prevalent. Residents raised alarms about the potential tax increases associated with the estimated $18 million cost of the new facilities, particularly in light of rising economic pressures. One resident cautioned against pursuing a grandiose police station at a time when many families are already struggling financially, questioning the wisdom of incurring significant debt for the project.

Overall, the meeting highlighted a divide among residents regarding the necessity and location of the new police and public works facilities, with calls for careful consideration of both community needs and fiscal responsibility.