Kinney family debates property variance impacting 88-year-old matriarch's future on family farm

During the December 11, 2024, meeting of the Walker Zoning Board of Appeals, a significant discussion unfolded regarding a dimensional variance request from John Kinney, aimed at modifying property lines on the family farm. The proposal seeks to maintain family ties while addressing the needs of the current property owner, Mary Kinney, who is 88 years old.

John Kinney, representing the family, emphasized the importance of preserving the family farm, which has been in their lineage since 1844. He expressed a desire to keep his mother on the property without the burden of upkeep, highlighting the emotional and historical significance of the land. The proposed changes would allow for better management of the property, particularly concerning the maintenance of barns and surrounding areas.

However, the request faced opposition from John’s sister, Jean Lawfield, who argued against the variance. She contended that the request was self-inflicted and that sufficient land exists to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for a one-acre parcel. Lawfield urged the board to consider alternative configurations that would not create a nonconforming lot, which she argued could be detrimental to their mother’s property rights and overall living conditions.

The board members engaged in a thorough discussion, weighing the implications of granting the variance against the need for compliance with zoning regulations. They acknowledged the importance of maintaining family properties while also adhering to established guidelines that protect the community's interests.

As the meeting progressed, the board considered the potential for an easement to ensure access to the property, which could provide a legal framework for future ownership changes. This approach was seen as a way to balance the Kinney family's needs with the zoning requirements.

The outcome of this meeting will have lasting implications for the Kinney family and the surrounding community, as the board deliberates on how to best support family continuity while upholding zoning laws. The decision is expected to reflect a commitment to preserving both the historical significance of the land and the rights of individual property owners.