In a recent government meeting, officials outlined the dual investigative processes following an officer-involved shooting incident that occurred on August 13. The Anchorage Police Department (APD) will conduct an internal investigation, while the Alaska Office of Special Prosecutions (OSP) will oversee a criminal investigation to determine if any charges are warranted.

The internal investigation, which will be carried out by a third-party investigator, focuses on administrative matters and compliance with departmental policies. In contrast, the criminal investigation aims to ascertain whether any criminal actions were taken by the officer involved or the individual who was shot. The OSP will supervise the criminal investigation, ensuring that all evidence, including witness statements and forensic data, is thoroughly examined.

During the meeting, officials clarified the procedural differences between the two investigations. The criminal investigation begins immediately after the incident, treating it like any homicide case, with homicide detectives and crime scene teams involved from the outset. Witnesses, both civilian and police, are separated and interviewed to gather comprehensive accounts of the event. The involved officer is also required to provide a statement, typically within 72 hours, while remaining on administrative leave.

Once the criminal investigation concludes, the OSP will issue a declination letter if no crime is found, allowing the APD to initiate its administrative investigation. This administrative process is mandatory for officers, who must cooperate fully, and can result in disciplinary actions, including termination, if policy violations are identified.

The meeting highlighted the complexities of coordinating these investigations, particularly the need for timely completion of the administrative investigation within a 45-day window after receiving the declination letter. This timeline is crucial, as delays could hinder the investigation's effectiveness.

Overall, the discussions emphasized the commitment to transparency and accountability in the wake of the incident, with both investigations designed to uphold public trust and ensure justice.