In a recent public hearing, the Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England presented petitions for infrastructure changes in the city, including the relocation of utility poles and the installation of underground facilities. The hearings were conducted in a structured format, allowing for public input and questions from city council members.

The first petition involved moving a utility pole on Devon Street approximately 8 feet west to address stability concerns due to a steep drop behind the pole. Albert Galvin, a design engineer from National Grid Electric, explained that the relocation was necessary to ensure a more stable pole line. The city council unanimously approved the petition, subject to conditions recommended by the city engineer.

The second petition sought approval for the installation of underground facilities and cables on Lakeshore Drive, initiated by a homeowner wishing to eliminate overhead lines on their property. Again, the council approved this petition without opposition.

The third petition involved the installation of a new utility pole on Cimarrono Drive to facilitate better monitoring of voltage fluctuations in the area. Galvin reiterated the need for a clean, straight line for accurate readings, and the council approved this request as well.

The most contentious discussion arose during the public hearing for a proposed pickleball facility at 119 Airport Boulevard. Attorney Pamela Brown represented Ambidextrous Ventures, LLC, outlining plans for a 19,950 square foot building with six indoor courts, an outdoor court, and ample parking. While some community members expressed excitement about the facility, significant concerns were raised regarding noise levels from the outdoor court and its proximity to residential areas.

Residents voiced worries about potential noise disturbances, particularly during tournaments, and questioned the adequacy of the proposed parking spaces. Several speakers highlighted the need for soundproofing measures and limited hours of operation to mitigate noise impact. The council members acknowledged these concerns, with some suggesting the possibility of eliminating the outdoor court altogether to address community apprehensions.

The hearing concluded with a commitment to further discussions in the Urban Affairs Committee, where the concerns raised will be thoroughly examined before any final decisions are made. The council's deliberations reflect a balance between fostering recreational opportunities and addressing the needs of the surrounding community.