In a recent disciplinary hearing concerning city employee Richard Schmidt, the commission deliberated on the appropriate course of action following allegations of misconduct. The session, which resumed after a lunch break, featured testimony from Spencer Coggs, the city treasurer and department head, who provided insights into the decision-making process regarding Schmidt's potential disciplinary measures.

Coggs revealed that while a discharge was considered, it was ultimately deemed inappropriate due to a lack of available positions for demotion. Instead, a 30-day suspension was proposed, which Coggs defended as a balanced response. He noted that while some might argue for a harsher penalty, he believed in the possibility of redemption and felt that the 30-day suspension would effectively communicate the seriousness of the situation.

The commission's discussions highlighted the challenges faced by both the commission and Schmidt, with members acknowledging the emotional toll the proceedings have taken on all parties involved. As the hearing progressed, commissioners were given the opportunity to question Coggs, who reiterated his stance that the suspension was a fair and measured response to the allegations against Schmidt.

The hearing is set to continue with cross-examination from Schmidt's attorney, Ben Hitchcock, as the commission seeks to reach a final decision on the matter. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for city employment practices and the handling of disciplinary actions in the future.