In a recent predisciplinary meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the actions of an employee, Richard Schmidt, related to improper financial transactions. The discussions highlighted a troubling incident where Schmidt allegedly authorized a payment that was not rightfully his to distribute, leading to questions about accountability and adherence to city financial protocols.

During the meeting, it was revealed that Schmidt had conferred with another individual, Austin Bodge, who supported the decision as a matter of customer service. However, this justification was met with skepticism, as it was clarified that funds owed to the city should not be redirected to individuals without proper authorization. The meeting underscored the principle that refunds should be returned to the original entity that provided the funds, not to individuals associated with them.

Further scrutiny was placed on Schmidt's understanding of the Wisconsin Help for Homeowners Act, which mandates that payments be directed specifically to homesteads. Schmidt admitted to being unaware of this requirement, raising concerns among the panel about his competency in a managerial role responsible for maintaining accurate financial records.

The panel deliberated on the appropriate disciplinary action, considering the severity of Schmidt's actions and his previous record of similar misconduct. While discharge was contemplated, the panel ultimately suggested a lesser form of discipline, acknowledging that Schmidt's actions were not intentional but rather a result of inefficiency. However, they expressed the need for accountability, emphasizing that such behavior from someone in a managerial position could undermine public trust in the city's financial management.

The meeting concluded with a consensus that disciplinary measures were warranted, reflecting a commitment to uphold standards of integrity and responsibility within the city's operations.