In a recent Board of Zoning Appeals meeting, discussions centered around a property owner's request for variances related to a proposed garage addition. The existing garage measures 430 square feet, while the applicant seeks to build a 763 square foot detached garage. However, staff recommended reducing the size to a maximum of 720 square feet to minimize impacts on neighboring properties.

The applicant, Jordan Kessler, explained that the decision to keep the garage detached was made to maximize usable yard space for his son, as previous designs had resulted in excessive lot coverage. Kessler emphasized that the new plan would decrease lot coverage by nearly 18%, allowing for more open space for play. He argued that the additional 43 square feet over the recommended size is minor, likening it to a common landscaping shed in the area.

The board considered several factors in their deliberation, including whether the variance would affect government services, if the property owners were aware of zoning restrictions at the time of purchase, and whether the property configuration was self-created. Staff indicated that the conditions of the parcel were not self-imposed and recommended approval for five of the seven variance requests.

Concerns were raised regarding the garage's proximity to neighboring properties and the potential for the structure to overshadow the principal residence. The board discussed the implications of the R3 zoning designation, which defaults to R2 standards, and whether the applicant was being unfairly penalized by the existing regulations.

Ultimately, the board's decision will hinge on balancing the applicant's needs with the intent of zoning laws designed to maintain neighborhood character and property values. The meeting concluded with an invitation for public comment, although no members of the public chose to speak on the matter. The board will reconvene to further discuss the variances and their implications for the community.