During a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a robust discussion regarding the roles and responsibilities of the mayor, the process for setting agenda items, and the treatment of city staff.

One of the key topics was the clarification of the mayor's authority, particularly in relation to council members. A council member raised concerns about whether the mayor has the power to dictate the attire of other council members, specifically referencing a colleague's preference for purple shirts. This led to a broader conversation about respect and equality among council members, emphasizing that no single member holds more power than another.

The council also deliberated on the process for determining agenda items. One member proposed that the city manager or assistant city manager should have a more significant role in setting the agenda, rather than allowing the mayor to unilaterally decide which topics are discussed. This suggestion stemmed from frustrations over perceived stifling of important issues and the need for a more democratic approach to agenda-setting.

Additionally, the council discussed the importance of valuing staff time, advising against contacting staff outside of business hours unless in true emergencies. This was highlighted as a necessary measure to maintain professionalism and respect for city employees.

As the city prepares for a charter review in May 2026, which will include the election of a new mayor, these discussions may lead to significant changes in governance and operational protocols. The council members expressed a desire for a more collaborative and transparent approach to decision-making, ensuring that all voices are heard and respected within the council.