During a recent city commission meeting, community members expressed concerns regarding the passage of a controversial ordinance, questioning the legitimacy of the voting process and seeking clarity on how to amend it.

One resident raised the issue of not having the opportunity to vote on the ordinance, prompting a response from city officials who explained that elected commissioners are tasked with representing the public and voting on such matters. They emphasized that citizens can approach their commissioners or the city manager to discuss potential amendments.

The discussion highlighted a sense of frustration among residents who felt the ordinance was not adequately communicated to the public prior to its approval. Concerns were voiced about the ordinance's impact on the community, with some residents arguing that it unfairly restricts their rights and does not consider the unique needs of local residents.

City officials provided guidance on the process for amending the ordinance, stating that residents can present their concerns directly to commissioners or the city manager. They noted that there is a limited timeframe—35 days until the ordinance's implementation—during which residents can advocate for changes.

The meeting underscored the importance of public engagement in local governance, as residents sought to ensure their voices are heard in the decision-making process. City officials encouraged ongoing dialogue and collaboration to address community concerns effectively.