During a recent board meeting, community member Mrs. Weaver expressed strong concerns regarding proposed increases in board member compensation, particularly in light of the current economic climate. She echoed sentiments previously shared by another attendee, Mrs. Baker, emphasizing that the timing of the pay raise appears disconnected from the struggles faced by the public, especially following significant stock market declines and ongoing job losses.

Weaver criticized the board's agenda, suggesting that the proposed increase in per diem payments for meetings—some of which reportedly extend beyond four hours—seems excessive. She highlighted that the district already holds more meetings than most others in the state, with many districts managing their affairs in just one or two meetings per month. This, she argued, raises questions about the necessity of the additional meetings and the associated costs to taxpayers.

Furthermore, Weaver pointed out the district's ongoing challenges with attendance, which has not recovered to pre-COVID levels. She noted a demographic shift in the community, with many new residents being older and less likely to have school-aged children, which could further impact enrollment and funding.

In a pointed remark, she questioned the absence of the superintendent from the meeting, suggesting that her suspension had ended and raising concerns about her employment status. Weaver concluded by indicating that there may be increased scrutiny of the board's financial decisions, hinting at potential public records requests to investigate the allocation of funds and the necessity of the numerous meetings.