During a recent government meeting, community members raised significant concerns regarding a proposed energy storage facility, particularly its ownership, operational safety, and environmental impact.

One participant questioned the ownership structure of the facility, seeking clarity on whether existing energy sources, such as local dams, would supply the energy stored, or if new energy sources would be developed. They also inquired about the process for releasing stored energy, specifically whether it would be sold to Puget Sound Energy and who would benefit from the profits generated.

Concerns about job creation were also highlighted, with the participant noting that while construction jobs may be available, the facility's unmanned nature suggests a lack of long-term employment opportunities for the community.

Another speaker, Sally Carlson, expressed fears about the potential for a meltdown at the facility, emphasizing the risks posed to nearby residents, particularly those living in a mobile home park. She questioned who would bear the costs of evacuating residents in the event of an emergency, highlighting the financial vulnerability of those affected.

Beverly Loudermilk echoed these concerns, criticizing the environmental implications of relying on lithium-ion battery technology. She warned of the risks associated with thermal runaway incidents, which could lead to pollution and health hazards for local communities and wildlife. Loudermilk argued that the proposed solution could exacerbate existing environmental issues rather than resolve them.

The meeting underscored a growing apprehension among community members regarding the safety and environmental sustainability of the energy storage project, reflecting broader concerns about the transition away from fossil fuels and the potential consequences of new energy technologies.