In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the stability and accountability of child welfare services, particularly in the context of a proposed bill aimed at improving support for children in need. A former Community Development Organization (CDO) leader, who has nearly two decades of experience in the field, expressed apprehension about the high turnover rates among staff in child welfare organizations. This turnover, they argued, undermines the stability that children require during critical transitions in their lives.

The speaker highlighted that many staff members leave for larger organizations, such as Child Protective Services (CPS), after gaining experience, which can lead to inconsistent care for vulnerable children. They emphasized the need for a reliable support system, stating, “These kids need stability, not only in their lives, but also in the folks that are going to be assisting them.”

Additionally, the speaker raised questions about oversight and accountability within these organizations. They called for a unified platform to ensure that all community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in child welfare are aligned in their efforts, warning that without such coordination, the proposed changes could inadvertently hinder progress for the children they aim to help.

Assemblymember Lackey echoed these concerns, referencing tragic cases in his district that highlight systemic failures. He pointed to the issue of non-substantiated claims in child welfare reports, which he believes contribute to an overrepresentation of children at risk. Citing well-known cases of child fatalities, he underscored the urgent need for reform in the system to prevent further tragedies.

The discussions reflect a critical examination of the current child welfare framework, emphasizing the necessity for stability, accountability, and effective coordination among organizations tasked with protecting vulnerable children. As the meeting concluded, it was clear that while the intent behind the proposed bill is commendable, significant concerns remain about its implementation and potential impact on the lives of children in need.