Become a Founder Member Now!

Controversial coastal addition sparks debate over flood zone regulations

August 23, 2024 | Nantucket County, Massachusetts


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Controversial coastal addition sparks debate over flood zone regulations
In a recent government meeting, the Commission reviewed an application from 13 Commercial Street, LLC, represented by Paul Santos of Nantucket Surveyors, seeking permission for an addition to an existing single-family home located at 13 Commercial Wharf. The property is situated in a coastal flood zone, specifically a velocity zone, which has raised concerns regarding compliance with updated flood zone standards.

The proposed addition, measuring approximately 24 feet in length and 10 feet in depth, aims to enhance the home's entryway and improve access. Santos explained that the existing structure is elevated on piers, and while the current first-floor elevation is at 8.1 feet, new regulations require it to be raised to 15.2 feet. However, the proposed renovations do not exceed the 50% threshold of the building's fair market value, allowing the owner, Anne, to maintain the current elevation without mandatory compliance to the new standards.

Commissioners expressed mixed opinions on the proposal. Some members, like Linda, supported the addition, emphasizing the need for structures to be elevated out of the flood zone for safety. Others raised concerns about the impact on coastal views and the appropriateness of building within the 50-foot no-build zone adjacent to the coastal beach. They highlighted that the original waiver for the property was granted for specific renovations, and the current request for an addition could be seen as an expansion beyond those parameters.

The discussion underscored the balance between improving residential structures and adhering to environmental regulations designed to protect coastal resources. The Commission will continue to deliberate on the application, weighing the architectural benefits against potential ecological impacts.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Massachusetts articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI