In a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around a proposed zoning change that would increase the tree canopy preservation requirement for a development project from 25% to 35%. The proposal, presented by applicant Will Kellstrom, aims to enhance environmental stewardship by ensuring that a greater portion of the property remains forested, surpassing the current standards set for the RSF4 Zoning District and even exceeding the highest existing requirement in the city.

The council was informed that the proposed Neighborhood Services General (NSG) zoning would allow for a maximum theoretical density of 119 residential units, although actual development would likely yield fewer units due to the tree preservation commitment and other development standards. The council's planning commission had previously voted 4-4 on the proposal, indicating a split opinion among members.

During the meeting, council members expressed a range of views. Some supported the increased preservation efforts, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the area's natural landscape and mitigating potential flooding and drainage issues. Others raised concerns about the implications of higher density development adjacent to preserved lands, citing the need for careful consideration of the viewshed and connectivity to surrounding areas.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and opposition. Local resident Lisa Orton urged the council to maintain the current RSF4 zoning, arguing that it would better protect the wooded areas and reduce traffic and environmental impacts. Conversely, property owner Ken Watson defended the proposed changes, asserting that the development would not exacerbate flooding and that the property had been underutilized for years.

Ultimately, the council voted in favor of the revised bill of assurance, which mandates the 35% tree canopy requirement, signaling a commitment to balancing development needs with environmental preservation. The decision underscores the ongoing debate in Fayetteville regarding land use, density, and the preservation of natural resources in urban planning.