Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Cattle harvest facility proposal sparks community debate

August 29, 2024 | Franklin County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Cattle harvest facility proposal sparks community debate
In a recent government meeting, officials discussed a conditional use permit application for a proposed cattle harvest facility in the Agricultural Production 20 (AP 20) zone, located west of US Highway 395. The facility, submitted by applicant Cody Haas of Long Crow Meat Processing, aims to utilize approximately 6,000 square feet for operations, excluding additional areas for septic systems and effluent lagoons.

The facility is designed to accommodate a maximum headcount of cattle, with the applicant requesting permission for up to 2,000 head. If approved, this headcount would be monitored, and any exceedance would require the applicant to return for an amended conditional use permit (CUP). The timeline for reaching this headcount is dictated by market conditions, with the understanding that the facility would not house the full number of cattle at once.

The meeting also highlighted the necessary permits and approvals required for the facility's construction and operation. These include compliance with health regulations from the Ben Franklin Health District, as well as permits from the USDA and the Department of Agriculture. The county's role primarily involves approving the site and ensuring that construction meets local engineering standards, while ongoing operations will be overseen by state and federal agencies.

Concerns were raised regarding potential odor and fly control, as well as the management of the effluent lagoon, which must be maintained to prevent unpleasant conditions. The meeting concluded with a reminder that any failure to comply with health and safety regulations could lead to the revocation of the CUP.

This proposed facility represents a significant development in local agricultural operations, with implications for both the economy and community health standards.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI