During a recent government meeting, concerns were raised about the late hours of council sessions, with some members expressing fatigue and frustration over meetings extending past midnight. One attendee highlighted the legal implications of conducting meetings after 12 a.m., urging the council to adhere to regulations.

Cindy March, a community member, voiced her dissatisfaction with the process surrounding the selection of the new chief of police, recalling a previous instance where the community's input was disregarded. She emphasized the need for transparent leadership and called for a more respectful approach to public meetings, particularly regarding the ongoing water quality issues, including E. Coli contamination.

March criticized the council for holding lengthy meetings that disrupt the work schedules of city employees, suggesting that the overtime costs incurred could be better allocated to community services, such as parks and recreation. She urged the council to consider the impact of their meeting schedules on the public and city staff, insisting that decorum should apply to all members, regardless of their positions.

In response to public comments, council members acknowledged the need for improved communication regarding meeting notices and the importance of transparency in the selection process for the police chief. They committed to providing clearer information about upcoming interviews and ensuring that the public is informed of any changes in the agenda.

The meeting concluded with a reminder of the importance of maintaining respectful dialogue and decorum in future sessions, as the council navigates community concerns and operational challenges.