During a recent government meeting, discussions centered on proposed changes to the appointment process for the election board, raising concerns about the perceived impartiality of the board. A council member questioned how granting the county council the authority to appoint all members, including the chair, might affect the board's neutrality.

In response, another member acknowledged the importance of impartiality but noted that the election board has historically struggled to maintain this standard. They expressed a desire for clearer mechanisms within the charter to address any misconduct by board members, emphasizing the need for accountability similar to that of other appointed boards and commissions (ABCs).

The member advocated for a charter amendment that would allow the county council to take action against election board members who engage in illegal activities or violate the charter, ensuring that the election board operates under the same standards as other ABCs.

Additionally, another council member proposed the idea of allowing the council to appoint one of its members to an ABC, suggesting that this could enhance communication between county committees and government branches while maintaining a balance of representation.

The discussions reflect ongoing efforts to refine governance structures and ensure accountability within the election process, highlighting the complexities of maintaining impartiality in appointed positions.