In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the environmental impact of a proposed expansion project by Dairy Ridge, particularly its implications for the declining B1 aquifer. A speaker emphasized the need for an independent investigation by neutral experts, citing discrepancies between the information provided by the company and findings from legal experts.

The speaker revealed alarming insights from a hydrologist hired by Dairy Ridge, who warned that at the current rate of water usage, the aquifer could be depleted within a decade. Despite this, the company is seeking to draw water from another aquifer while simultaneously proposing an expansion, raising questions about their commitment to protecting local water resources.

Further complicating the discussion, the speaker highlighted the potential environmental risks associated with the use of digested manure, which reportedly contains higher ammonia levels than stored manure. This raises concerns about nitrate levels in the aquifer, prompting inquiries to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regarding regulations on digested manure. The MPCA acknowledged the higher ammonia content but indicated that current regulations do not classify it as having elevated nitrate levels.

The speaker also criticized the portrayal of the project as environmentally friendly, pointing out that emissions from cows and manure transport are not accounted for in the project's green energy claims. According to a letter from the MPCA, the project is expected to release significant amounts of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and greenhouse gases, contradicting its green energy narrative.

With the project estimated to cost several million dollars, the speaker called for thorough scrutiny and transparency, emphasizing that those promoting the project do not reside in the affected area. The meeting underscored the community's demand for clarity and accountability regarding the environmental implications of the proposed expansion.