In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the complexities of zoning regulations and their impact on property development, particularly regarding density designations and clustering options. A key point raised was the disparity in buildable acreage due to topographical variations, which can significantly alter the appearance and functionality of a property once developed.

Participants highlighted that while a property may be zoned for a certain density, the actual usable area can be much less, leading to potential visual and structural differences in developments. For instance, a 100-acre rezoning might only yield 50 acres of buildable land, resulting in a denser, more urban appearance akin to that seen in Tijuana, as opposed to a more spacious layout typical of lower-density areas.

The current zoning code allows for some clustering of units but lacks a formal cluster option that many other communities have adopted. This absence means that while developers can cluster units on a property, they cannot create separate lots for each unit, limiting flexibility in design. The discussion underscored the need for a more nuanced approach to zoning that considers both density and the unique characteristics of the land.

Examples from other jurisdictions were cited, such as Pima County, which has successfully implemented clustering for decades, allowing for higher densities in areas with challenging topography. In contrast, Marana has historically resisted clustering, reflecting the contentious nature of these zoning practices.

The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for potential revisions to the zoning code to better accommodate diverse development styles while addressing community concerns about density and aesthetics.