During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the proposal from the City of Burns to expand the Burns Urban Renewal Agency's footprint and tax base. Concerns were raised regarding the implications of this expansion, particularly as it pertains to the definition of \"blighted property.\" Some members expressed skepticism, arguing that the proposed developments, including vacant land and industrial zones, do not meet the criteria for blight and could lead to increased costs for the county.

One participant highlighted the economic burden faced by local producers, noting that the cost of onions in Ontario is higher than in neighboring Fruitland due to production expenses. This point underscored the broader economic challenges within the county.

The discussion also touched on the need for clarity regarding the decision-making process for the Urban Renewal Agency. Several officials expressed confusion about their roles, particularly concerning voting rights and the composition of the advisory committee. There was a consensus that representatives from various taxing districts should have a say in the expansion process to ensure that all stakeholders are adequately represented.

Concerns were voiced about potential reductions in funding for essential services, including the public library, as the county's revenues continue to decline. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the financial implications of the Urban Renewal Agency's actions on the community's tax base.

As the meeting concluded, officials agreed to further investigate the proposal and its potential impacts, with plans to invite relevant stakeholders for a more comprehensive discussion in the future.