In a recent government meeting, a heated discussion emerged regarding the application process for specialty positions within the police department, particularly focusing on the case of Sergeant Swearingen. Officer Brian West detailed his refusal to endorse Swearingen's application, citing serious concerns stemming from the sergeant's recent suspension for violations of sexual harassment policy and neglect of duty.

West emphasized that he could not support an application for a specialty position for someone who had just come off suspension, particularly given the nature of the allegations, which Chief Mitchell had described as \"sexual grooming of a detention aid.\" He expressed that signing off on the application would imply his endorsement, which he was unwilling to provide.

The conversation also highlighted issues with Lieutenant Bobolak, who initially endorsed Swearingen's application despite being on a performance improvement plan himself. West criticized Bobolak's leadership abilities, suggesting that his desire to be \"everybody's friend\" compromised his supervisory responsibilities. He recounted a conversation with Bobolak, who appeared panicked after realizing West would not sign the application.

West's testimony raised questions about the integrity of the endorsement process and the leadership within the department. He underscored the importance of accountability, stating, \"I'm not just a police officer. I'm a father. I'm a husband, and I ain't endorsing him.\" The implications of this discussion could have significant repercussions for departmental policies and the handling of misconduct allegations moving forward.