During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered on a proposed zoning amendment to allow cigar lounges as permitted uses within the 105th entertainment district. The council clarified that the item under consideration was not the approval of a specific business but rather a change in zoning regulations.

Council member Soraya raised questions regarding the mayor's recusal from the discussion, seeking clarity on whether he had any ownership interest in the proposed cigar lounge. City Attorney Lunan explained that while there was no statutory requirement for recusal, the mayor chose to step back due to his connections with business partners interested in operating such a venue.

The meeting also featured concerns from council members regarding public health implications. Council member Larson highlighted letters from significant organizations, including the Minnesota Department of Health and the American Lung Association, which expressed opposition to the cigar lounge, citing potential health risks and the message it could send to youth about smoking. Larson pointed out a perceived inconsistency in the Department of Health's stance, noting that similar concerns were not raised when marijuana was legalized, which will soon require one dispensary for every 12,000 residents.

The discussion underscored a broader debate about public health priorities and the regulation of emerging businesses in the community. Council member Newland raised questions about how the proposed cigar lounges would comply with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, which prohibits indoor smoking, indicating ongoing concerns about the implications of the zoning change.

As the council deliberates on this amendment, the tension between supporting small businesses and addressing public health concerns remains a focal point of the discussion.