During a recent government meeting, a significant discussion emerged regarding a controversial mural that has drawn criticism from various community members. Council member Benavente proposed a motion to remove the mural, arguing that it was merely performative and failed to address the underlying issues that necessitated policy change. He emphasized that removing the mural would prevent ongoing discontent over the next few years while a comprehensive survey is conducted to gather community feedback.

The motion sparked a debate among council members. One member expressed confusion, recalling that previous discussions had indicated plans to remove the mural as part of a broader study. This member questioned the necessity of the current motion, suggesting that the council had already voted on the matter.

Despite the push for removal, the motion ultimately failed to gain traction, as it did not receive a second from other council members. However, the conversation highlighted the ongoing tensions surrounding the mural and the council's approach to community engagement and policy reform.

As the meeting progressed, attention shifted to other topics, including discussions about the painting around the market house, indicating that the council is navigating multiple community concerns simultaneously. The outcome of the mural debate underscores the complexities of local governance and the challenges of addressing community sentiments while pursuing meaningful policy changes.