In a recent government meeting, California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed strong opposition to Proposition 36, labeling it a regressive measure that harkens back to the failed policies of the 1980s war on drugs. Newsom, who authored Proposition 1, criticized the initiative for its lack of funding for treatment facilities, stating that 22 counties in California do not have a single residential treatment center. He emphasized that Proposition 36 would not address retail theft, which he argued is a pressing issue requiring immediate legislative action.

The governor highlighted the financial implications of Proposition 36, noting that it could cost the state $1 billion without providing any resources for the courts, which are already facing significant backlogs. In contrast, he pointed to the $81 million allocated for the Care Court initiative, which aims to create a structured approach to mental health and addiction treatment.

During the meeting, Newsom outlined his administration's commitment to tackling retail theft through a comprehensive package of ten new bills designed to hold third-party platforms accountable for facilitating the sale of stolen goods. He stressed the importance of dismantling organized retail theft rings and ensuring that law enforcement has the necessary tools to address these crimes effectively.

Responding to questions about the relationship between drug addiction and retail theft, Newsom reiterated that Proposition 36 would divert funds from effective programs established under Proposition 47, which allocates money for drug treatment and victim services. He acknowledged the ongoing challenges related to poverty and addiction but asserted that the state has made significant strides in addressing these issues through various legislative efforts.

As the November ballot approaches, Newsom indicated that while he does not plan to actively campaign against Proposition 36, he expects the media and public to critically evaluate its potential consequences. He expressed concern over the support for the initiative from some mayors, suggesting that their backing does not reflect the broader Democratic party's stance.

The governor concluded by urging Californians to consider the historical context of mass incarceration and its detrimental effects on communities, particularly among marginalized populations. He emphasized the need for a forward-looking approach that prioritizes rehabilitation and community support over punitive measures.