During a recent government meeting, community member Laurie Boiko raised significant concerns regarding the Simsbury school district's new curriculum, which she claims promotes a form of social indoctrination among students. Boiko criticized the board for what she perceives as a lack of transparency and accountability, particularly regarding the implementation of a program that assigns numerical social credit scores to students based on personal qualities.

Boiko expressed frustration over the board's apparent neglect of pressing issues within the community, likening Simsbury's situation to that of fictional towns known for their superficiality. She argued that the focus on teaching students to communicate in a \"pleasant\" manner detracts from academic achievement and fails to address real problems, such as substance abuse among peers.

She questioned whether the board had properly reviewed and approved the new curriculum, emphasizing that such oversight is required by law. Boiko demanded access to meeting minutes and documentation related to the curriculum's approval process, asserting that if the program had not been adequately vetted, it should be halted immediately.

The meeting also included a brief update from the communications committee, which reported no new developments. The discussions highlighted a growing tension between community expectations and school policies, underscoring the need for greater dialogue and transparency in educational governance.