During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed variance for a new structure in a residential area. The homeowners, who are new to the community, presented their case for a five-foot side setback to facilitate the construction of a garage/shop for personal use, including hobbies such as motorcycle rebuilding.

The couple explained that they had recently purchased the property, which previously featured a pool and a burn pit—both of which are set to be removed to create more open yard space. They emphasized that the proposed structure would not dominate the backyard, as much of it would remain clear.

Concerns were raised by board members regarding the size and height of the proposed building, particularly in relation to the existing home. The homeowners acknowledged these concerns, noting that they had already reduced the initial design from a two-story to a one-story structure to comply with neighborhood aesthetics. They argued that the building would be constructed of wood and would not resemble the larger, metal warehouse-style structures seen in the area.

The board members expressed a desire for further clarification on the size, with some suggesting that a reduction could be beneficial for approval. The homeowners indicated a willingness to adjust the dimensions if necessary, stating they could potentially reduce the size to meet the board's preferences.

The meeting highlighted the balance between individual property rights and community standards, as the homeowners sought to align their plans with existing structures in the neighborhood while addressing concerns about the visual impact of their proposed garage/shop. The outcome of the variance request remains pending as further discussions and considerations take place.