During a recent Annapolis city council meeting, significant opposition emerged against proposed legislation that would prohibit new drive-through facilities within the city. The bill, which aims to restrict the establishment of drive-throughs regardless of community needs, has sparked a heated debate among local stakeholders, including banking representatives and residents.

Evan Richards, head of government community affairs for the Maryland Bankers Association, emphasized the vital role banks play in communities, highlighting their contributions beyond basic financial services. He argued that drive-throughs are essential for accessibility, particularly for parents, elderly residents, and those with mobility challenges. Richards warned that if the legislation passes, potential new banks may choose to locate outside city limits, leading to a decline in community services and tax revenue.

Marilyn Coolidge, a resident of a local retirement community, echoed these sentiments, sharing personal experiences that underscored the importance of drive-through access for residents with limited mobility. She expressed concern that the proposed ordinance fails to consider the needs of vulnerable populations who rely on such facilities for essential services.

Critics of the legislation pointed out that the city has not seen any new drive-through permits in the last five years, suggesting that the proposed ban is unnecessary. They urged the council to reconsider the implications of restricting drive-throughs, arguing that it could hinder community development and accessibility.

The council is now faced with the challenge of balancing urban planning goals with the practical needs of residents and businesses. As discussions continue, stakeholders are calling for a more nuanced approach that considers the evolving landscape of banking and community services in Annapolis.