Residents expressed frustration during a recent city council meeting regarding the replacement of sidewalks in their neighborhoods. One resident highlighted the disparity in sidewalk replacements, noting that while sidewalks on Reagan Street were replaced, those on Susquehanna Avenue remained in disrepair. The resident emphasized the poor condition of sidewalks on Fort Sturkey Hill, which have not been updated in over 30 years, and questioned the decision-making process behind the sidewalk replacement project.

Concerns were raised about the planned street expansion, which was initially proposed to be six feet but was later adjusted to five feet, with discrepancies noted regarding the actual measurements. The resident questioned the allocation of funds, suggesting that if the project was scaled back, the remaining budget should be available for sidewalk replacements.

City officials responded, clarifying that sidewalk replacements are determined based on specific criteria, including safety concerns such as cracks and uneven surfaces. They acknowledged that not all sidewalks deemed in poor condition would be replaced, citing budget constraints and federal funding guidelines that limit replacements to those that pose a tripping hazard.

The discussion underscored ongoing community concerns about infrastructure maintenance and the perceived inequities in city services, prompting residents to seek further clarification and action from city officials.