Sudan's Vice President vows military victory over RSF militia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Sudan remains embroiled in a devastating conflict between the national army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia, now in its 16th month, with millions of civilians caught in the crossfire. Recent peace talks mediated by the United States in Geneva saw the RSF send a delegation, but they ultimately did not participate, while the Sudanese armed forces boycotted the discussions entirely.
In an exclusive interview, Sudan's Vice President Malik Agar, a key figure in the military junta that has ruled since 2021, expressed skepticism about international mediation efforts. He argued that the only viable solution to the conflict is the complete military defeat of the RSF, which he described as a tool of foreign powers, particularly the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Agar criticized any leader who engages in negotiations with the RSF, labeling such actions as treasonous.
The conflict escalated dramatically last April, catching many Sudanese off guard. Agar noted that the Sudanese army has shifted from a defensive to an offensive stance, complicating the military landscape. He emphasized the significant impact of foreign weapons supplied to the RSF, which have altered the dynamics of the war. Agar acknowledged that the Sudanese army lacks access to similar advanced weaponry, which has hindered their efforts.
The Vice President's comments also highlighted the complex web of international interests in Sudan, particularly regarding the UAE's economic ambitions, including gold mining and agricultural investments. He called on the United States to reconsider its arms sales to the UAE, suggesting that such support indirectly fuels the conflict and undermines human rights in Sudan.
Despite ongoing U.S. efforts to mediate peace talks, Agar expressed doubt about the seriousness of American involvement, citing a lack of direct engagement with Sudanese leaders. He criticized the U.S. special envoy for Sudan for not visiting the country, questioning the commitment to genuine dialogue.
As the war continues, the prospect of returning to a democratic governance structure remains uncertain. Agar stated that while the military intends to hold elections and transfer power to a democratically elected leader post-conflict, the immediate focus is on military victory, with democracy currently sidelined.
In an exclusive interview, Sudan's Vice President Malik Agar, a key figure in the military junta that has ruled since 2021, expressed skepticism about international mediation efforts. He argued that the only viable solution to the conflict is the complete military defeat of the RSF, which he described as a tool of foreign powers, particularly the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Agar criticized any leader who engages in negotiations with the RSF, labeling such actions as treasonous.
The conflict escalated dramatically last April, catching many Sudanese off guard. Agar noted that the Sudanese army has shifted from a defensive to an offensive stance, complicating the military landscape. He emphasized the significant impact of foreign weapons supplied to the RSF, which have altered the dynamics of the war. Agar acknowledged that the Sudanese army lacks access to similar advanced weaponry, which has hindered their efforts.
The Vice President's comments also highlighted the complex web of international interests in Sudan, particularly regarding the UAE's economic ambitions, including gold mining and agricultural investments. He called on the United States to reconsider its arms sales to the UAE, suggesting that such support indirectly fuels the conflict and undermines human rights in Sudan.
Despite ongoing U.S. efforts to mediate peace talks, Agar expressed doubt about the seriousness of American involvement, citing a lack of direct engagement with Sudanese leaders. He criticized the U.S. special envoy for Sudan for not visiting the country, questioning the commitment to genuine dialogue.
As the war continues, the prospect of returning to a democratic governance structure remains uncertain. Agar stated that while the military intends to hold elections and transfer power to a democratically elected leader post-conflict, the immediate focus is on military victory, with democracy currently sidelined.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting