In a recent government meeting, discussions centered on a proposed residential project that has raised concerns regarding drainage and zoning variances. The potential buyer, Robert Lariviere, highlighted issues with an existing drainage pipe, which he claimed is ineffective due to its shallow depth and age. He reported that recent rains caused flooding in a nearby basement, prompting him to suggest that the drainage easement be deepened to prevent future water problems as he plans to build a new home.

Lariviere proposed collaborating with the local diocese to install a new drainage pipe that would better manage water runoff from the adjacent hills. He emphasized the importance of addressing these drainage issues proactively to protect his investment in the new construction.

The board discussed the legal aspects of the drainage easement, noting that it grants rights for installation and maintenance of the drainage line. While some members expressed that the drainage issue is a private matter, others suggested that a condition be added to ensure that the drainage concerns are adequately addressed before moving forward with the project.

Additionally, the meeting touched on changes in zoning laws since the original application in 1993, with legal representatives explaining that recent legal precedents and demographic shifts necessitate a reevaluation of housing needs in the area. The proposed project reflects a shift towards denser housing, which aligns with current community demands.

Overall, the board appeared supportive of the project, recognizing that it would not negatively impact the neighborhood's character and could enhance safety by improving parking and access for tenants. The discussions concluded with a consensus on the need for further clarification on drainage issues as the project progresses to the planning board for subdivision approval.