Become a Founder Member Now!

Zoning Board Approves Controversial Healthcare Office Variance

August 07, 2024 | Manchester Planning & Zoning Board, Manchester, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Zoning Board Approves Controversial Healthcare Office Variance
In a recent government meeting, the Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) addressed several applications for variances, including a notable case concerning Jessica Mill's proposal to establish an office for healthcare practitioners. Local residents Donald and Patricia Healy expressed concerns regarding the limited parking availability, highlighting that the proposed eight parking spots would be insufficient for both employees and patients, potentially leading to overflow onto Union Street and disrupting neighboring tenants.

However, the board clarified that the parking relief request was not under their jurisdiction, as it was directed to the planning board. Board members discussed the historical use of the property, which has housed various commercial entities since the 1960s, and concluded that the proposed healthcare office would not significantly alter the neighborhood's character. Ultimately, the board unanimously granted the variance, allowing the application to proceed.

The meeting also covered additional cases, including a request from Derek and Joyce Hodgman to maintain existing structures at their property on Brent Street. The Hodgmans sought variances for a rear deck, a shed, and a second parking space, all of which have been in place for over 20 years. The board found no objections from the public and agreed that maintaining these structures would benefit the neighborhood, leading to another unanimous approval.

Another application involved Brian Roy's proposal to install a fiberglass pool at 14 West Appleton Street. The board discussed the unique circumstances of the property, which is located at the end of a dead-end street, making the side yard the only viable location for the pool. The request for a slightly taller fence than allowed was also considered reasonable given the lack of neighboring properties in view. The board found no detriment to public interest and approved the variance, allowing the homeowners to enhance their property for family enjoyment.

Overall, the meeting reflected the board's commitment to balancing community concerns with property rights, as they navigated through various applications with a focus on maintaining neighborhood integrity while accommodating reasonable requests for variances.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI