In a recent California Transportation Commission (CTC) meeting, significant discussions centered around the State Route 710 Local Alternative Transportation Improvement Program and the sale of surplus properties in South Pasadena. The meeting marked a farewell for Teresa Favilla, a long-serving member of the commission, who was recognized for her contributions and dedication to the agency.

The commission reviewed draft guidelines for the allocation of funds generated from the sale of State Route 710 excess properties, which are designated for five eligible jurisdictions: Pasadena, South Pasadena, Alhambra, La Cañada Flintridge, and a specific area in Los Angeles. The guidelines, developed after extensive public workshops since 2018, aim to ensure that the funding is distributed equitably among the jurisdictions, with an emphasis on community engagement in project selection.

Public comments highlighted concerns regarding Caltrans' community engagement practices, particularly from representatives of the El Cerro Community Land Trust and affected residents. Fanny Guzman and other speakers criticized the agency for perceived discriminatory practices during public meetings and called for more inclusive participation from vulnerable communities impacted by the 710 Freeway project. They urged Caltrans to collaborate with local organizations to develop solutions that address displacement and housing insecurity.

In contrast, Patricia Chen from LA Metro expressed support for the proposed guidelines, acknowledging the challenges faced during their development, particularly amid changing legislation and the pandemic.

The meeting also addressed the approval of five director's deeds for the sale of historic properties in South Pasadena, which are intended to be restored and converted into affordable housing units. City Council member Janet Braun emphasized the importance of these properties in addressing housing needs and thanked Caltrans for their cooperation in the process.

As the commission prepares to finalize the guidelines in October, stakeholders continue to advocate for equitable practices that prioritize the needs of the communities most affected by transportation projects. The discussions reflect ongoing tensions between development goals and community preservation, underscoring the need for transparent and inclusive decision-making processes in transportation planning.