In a recent government meeting, lawmakers expressed significant concerns regarding a bill that seeks to transfer authority over the Guam Department of Education (GDOE) to the governor. The discussions highlighted a contentious history of executive power and legislative oversight, particularly referencing actions taken by the governor in 2022.

One lawmaker recounted a past incident where the governor unilaterally implemented substantial pay raises and bonuses for GDOE employees, totaling nearly $21 million, without formal legislative approval. This move raised questions about the governor's authority, as it was executed through a memorandum rather than an executive order or statute. The lawmaker emphasized that while the pay raises were justified, the process lacked transparency and proper authorization.

The current bill under discussion proposes to extend the governor's authority over GDOE for an additional two and a half years, effectively consolidating power within the executive branch. Critics argue that this move contradicts the principles of democracy, which delineate clear boundaries between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. They questioned why the governor, who previously acted independently in 2022, now seeks legislative approval for similar actions.

The debate also touched on the political implications of the bill, with some lawmakers suggesting that the timing of the proposal is influenced by upcoming elections. They argued that the governor's request for permission to act, despite having previously exercised similar powers, raises concerns about accountability and governance.

As the meeting progressed, lawmakers continued to scrutinize the bill, emphasizing the need for a collaborative approach that respects the roles of all branches of government. The discussions reflect ongoing tensions regarding executive authority and legislative oversight in Guam, as stakeholders seek to navigate the complexities of governance in the territory.